The Scillonians

Many years ago in the Iron Age. Although entrance graves from the neolithic/bronze ag

Entrance graves are found in close association with simple and cist cairns. A contemporary association also exists between entrance graves and menhirs. Though not uncommon in Scilly entrance graves are rare in England. These monuments exhibit some diversity in their form. A menhir/long stone is a deliberately set upright stone and serves as a ritual or burial monument.

Entrance graves have very restricted distribution within the British isles. In England they are confined to the isles of Scilly and west penwith in Cornwall. Further afield they have been recorded in the Tramore area of south east Ireland and lesser numbers of vaguely comparable monuments are known in the channel islands and Brittany. Entrance graves are scattered over much of Scilly though there are particularly large concentrations on Samson, gugh and the south east edge of St Mary’s most are set along ridges, relatively level gently sloping downs or on hill summits, in some cases they are near to ancient sea cliffs and a few are known the bottom of slopes and close to the modern shoreline.

Menhirs in Scilly range in height from1.5 to 2.4m.

Contemporary associations exist between hut circles and  entrance graves and cists so are these the graves of resident/indigenous scillonians or are they the memorials of people who do not live on the islands but who came here to be buried in this ‘place at the edge of the earth’ High Kings’ ‘people of high honour, stature or religious standing’ Another final resting place ‘in the west nearest the setting sun and the edge of the world would have been in West Cornwall mayhap for the internment of those not high or wealthy enough to afford the carriage to Scilly.

Evidence hA BEEN found of a goodly sized population on Scilly but not of there being a profitable or worthwhile agricultural or manufacturing industries  to generate an income and trading economy with other settlements outside the islands with one exception; the burial of the dead?

And he saw that it was good

For arguments sake let’s assume that the Earth was created by God (bear with me on this, even you non-theists, I’ve been thinking about it!). At each stage of his work he checked on it and made sure it was okay, only when he ‘saw that it was good’ did he move onto the next part of his project.

Once god had completed his Creation and had given Man, his supreme creature, stewardship over all things he left them to get on with it. God was always there for Man if they needed help and support but since they had eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge they had freedom of will and of choice in what they could do (bear in mind that the scriptures were written at a time where Man’s thoughts were mainly attributed to divine action and influence, the writers did not have the cognitive capability of attributing Man’s thoughts to anything other than supernatural influence; if it was good God made you think it, if it was bad the devil made you do it.) So Man’s early attempts at living were not going well, a brother killed his brother, father attempted to kill his son, a man built a ship to save animals and his immediate family from a flood but left the rest, his mother, father, aunts, uncles, all his and his children’s in-laws and all the people that helped him build his ship to perish (you don’t think he built that great boat all by himself?). Eventually, so we are told, god felt that the time was right to give Man a set of rules to live by, the ‘Ten Commandments’ (there were a lot more but the ‘Ten’ were the main ones, applicable to everyone within the community.) The question I often ask of atheists etc who condemn these ‘rules’ is ‘Which of the Ten Commandments proscribe something that you feel you have a need or a right to do or have done to you by someone else? With the possible exception of the First Commandment, an objection that can be obviated by reaching a closer understanding of the meaning of the term ‘God’ the others are rules for living together in a society, Respect for each member of the community and their possessions (you can choose which category a wife falls into?) and having respect for the community itself (Honour thy father and mother [respect the history and traditions of your society]. Do not use the name of the Lord your God in vain [‘name’ here means more than just a nomenclature it includes the whole ethos of the named one] .)

The other commandments are ‘rules’ for living in a community. nothing godly or spiritual about them, they just explain how to be nice to each other.

And what if god doesn’t exist, do the same rules apply?

The famed anthropologist Magerate Mead recorded that the first sign she saw in the fossils of humans of Civilisation developing was when she unearthed a skeleton with a broken femur that had ‘healed’. This person had been cared for and tended to whilst the bone set and afterwards when they were unable to take part in hunting. They were they given a less active role in the hunt or assigned another job in the community that did not involve running (or even standing unsupported)? Unlike in other animal societies they were not just allowed to die. If this was not a god-inspired code of practice or way of living then the evolution of the human brain and mind had instilled in them a community spirit of mutual assistance and dependency (to witness this development in action watch the documentary ‘One Million Years BC’ and see how the brutality of the cave dwellers towards each other was transformed when they encountered the cooperative morals of the coast dwellers who helped and respected each other. (this documentary also shows that Man invented the eyebrow tweezers before he invented the wheel. [think about it, even Neanderthals made and wore jewelry so mayhap early female Man dolled herself up a bit!])

Joshing aside, was there a factor in the evolution of the Homo Sapiens that brought about cooperation and ‘rules’ for communal living, if there was, would those ‘rules’ be very different from the ten commandments?

Man is not a solitary animal, he seeks community, indeed he needs community, to thrive. To live in a community successfully requires rules, whether these rules were given by god or by evolution is not the first issue to be dealt with here, it is that they are there and when followed a community turns into a society and all can flourish.

Think about it